“For students who are grappling with the process of learning how to photograph people, there are two possibilities. You can look someone in the eye and be calm and smile and be sincere with them, and then they have a choice: to either allow you to make a photograph or not. But one way or another, by virtue of the fact that you’re honouring them by looking them in the eye, they’re not going to be upset. But on the other hand, if you take a picture and turn away someone’s going to feel like you’ve just taken something from them. They are aware immediately if you are not comfortable with yourself. And if you’re not comfortable with yourself, they’re not going to be comfortable with you either.” Peter Turnley
One of the most frequent questions and subsequent discussions within classes at the Bangkok Photo School is “How do I go about photographing people in public?”. I found Peter Turnley’s quote, above, in a recent edition of “News Photographer”, the journal of the National Press Photographers’ Association and it seems to explain the principles that we try to teach students during classes at the school.
At the risk of boring students who have already heard me repeat this mantra in class, if photography is about communicating an experience, and it is, then you need to have had the experience in the first place before you can photograph it. I think photographers often approach their attempts to photograph people in public in a rather awkward way. Their goal (our goal, I guess, since it’s often my aim too), is to capture an image of a person that is, for want of a better word, “engaging”. We’ve all been enchanted by Steve McCurry’s portrait of the “Afghan Girl” and can’t argue that it’s not an engaging image… those eyes! But McCurry captured that engaging photograph as part of a bigger story, his aim was to illustrate how life was for Afghan refugees and it was that aim that motivated his photography.
I think it’s worth examining what our own aims are when we set out to photograph people we don’t know. I believe that too often the aim of many photographers amounts to little more than getting a close-up shot of an exotic face. Tightly framed, we want that McCurry shot, we want our own Afghan Girl. The fact that we’re in Thailand and photographing a street vendor and not in a war zone engaging with a refugee is irrelevant – “this face looks different from my own and the folks back home will think I’m Steve McCurry when I show them how close I got”. No, they won’t. The folks back home will wonder why the lady in your picture has an expression half-way between a smile (because she’s trying to please you and offer a happy expression) and terror induced by the fact that you’ve just shoved a 200mm lens in her face.
OK, I see a precipice ahead so let me back up a little before I leap off the edge and descend into a rant. We need to examine our aims. We need to understand our own motivations and appreciate what the driving force is behind our desire to photograph people in public. Is it about us, or about them? Are we hoping to get a picture with which to impress our family and friends with evidence of how adventurous we have been or do we wish, sincerely, to tell our subject’s story? I’ll repeat it because it’s a good mental check to consider when you’re about to pick up that 200mm lens, “Is this about me, or about them?”.
Too often, I see visitors photographing the streets and markets of Thailand as if it were a kind of Disney World, a series of set-pieces laid on for their amusement and entertainment. The market traders and street vendors are sometimes viewed as if they were out-of-work actors, hired to populate a picturesque diorama, employed to assist in the visitor’s aim of capturing an “exotic” scene. I understand how this happens and I’m not being as critical as I might sound – honestly! The reassuring observation is that there are just as many photographers who want to engage with their surroundings and who seek to locate and explore their experiences before attempting to take photographs.
So, in an attempt to find a point with which to conclude this rambling post, the answer to the question “How do I go about photographing people in public” is to point out that there is perhaps a more pertinent question to be asked: “How do I go about making the people I wish to photograph feel comfortable and confident?”. By turning the question around, we are no longer concentrating on making ourselves feel comfortable but instead putting the focus back where it belongs, on our subject. The first steps to creating engaging street portraits are to put the camera away, to be friendly, to smile, to make eye-contact, to engage and to invest some time understanding our subject (I prefer to say “new-found friend” but it’s an awkward phrase to get into a sentence) and, above all, to acknowledge what our own aims are.
Perhaps our vocabulary needs to change in order to reflect the better path – instead of “capturing” an image or “taking” a picture, perhaps we should instead be “sharing” an exchange or “creating” a shared moment. Either way, you might not come home with an image to rival McCurry’s “Afghan Girl” but your pictures of street vendors, monks, parents and children will have the sort of honesty and integrity that might really impress the folks back home.
P.S. The image at the top of this post was taken in Fatehpur Masjid in Old Delhi – I hope that it conveys this man’s very warm expression and calm demeanour. I spent some time talking with him before asking to take this image and his was among the series of prints that I took back to the mosque a couple of days later, to give to some of the people I had met there. It forms the first image seen on the home page of this updated web site design.
Excellent piece! Expertly and succinctly put and can be summed up in your experiential re-definition of photographing actually anything, including the people you are addressing in this piece: “‘sharing’ an exchange or ‘creating’ a shared moment.” Will definitely share this via Facebook and Twitter. Thank you for a deeper perspective.
Gavin, I understand the point you are trying to get across here and agree with it’s core most of the time. The most pleasant looking portraits I have are where I have engaged with the subject, even if we can’t speak the same language. I don’t own a 200mm lens and so need to get considerably closer and don’t habitually like to upset people. I know we’ve discussed taking photos of people eating, washing, sleeping and your views on intruding into people’s lives by capturing a moment that would otherwise have dissappeared into the past; but sometimes I feel there are scenes I want to record, even have a duty to record, that show us humans in our base, natural states. That’s life.
I learned so much from this piece, more than from any other blog post in a long time. THANK YOU!
Anthony, I think you’re absolutely right but I guess it boils down to intention. I actually don’t have an issue with people photographing others going about their daily lives if it’s a genuine attempt to capture the essence of a scene.
All too often, the “candid” shot is the one the photographers take because they feel more comfortable than engaging with their subject. That shouldn’t be the motivation. The candid shot, for me, is taken when there’s some justification, as you describe, recording our lives naturally and without embellishment.
I know you and how you photograph and would be certain that you’d have the confidence to also engage with your subjects with a winning smile and a willingness to communicate. And with that confidence comes the opportunity to reassure people that you are still respecting them and that you’re depicting them with due regard for their feelings.
As I say, it’s about intention and, from my experience, you’re like many photographers who wish to capture a scene in order to illustrate a reality and you’ll make sure that there’s some kind of exchange – it’s not a selfish kind of photography, it’s much more about sharing.
Thanks for taking the time to comment.
Gavin,
I cannot agree more with you. Although I am afraid that in spite of my efforts I sometimes fail to achieve this contact between the subject and me… (o_o;
I am sure that re-thinking about my vocabulary as you mentioned in the last part of the post could help. Sharing is so important.
I also find something strange. If I engage with people and have a real connection with them, if I feel we have shared some nice moment, I don’t feel like taking the camera and take the picture as if it would send the message: “this guy just talked to me for…. that”. Sounds weird I guess…. but I felt it so many times.
By the way, congratulations for your new webpage. It is sober, clear and I would dare to say peaceful (not sure what it means though but that the way I feel here
I think the key word is respect. I almost (unless it would ruin the atmosphere) ask for some kind of permission, be it verbal or just implied.
I find it also very helpful to give people something in return. To that purpose, I carry a small Polaroid Pogo Printer with me. It beats writing down email-addresses (if already my subjects would have one).
Wonderful photos and a great post. I have been guilty of “hit and run” people pictures and invariably find that the results are nowhere near as good as the photos made when I take the time to interact.
Amen!
Great post, Gavin.
I remember reading an article about Ami Vitale living with a family for 3 weeks before she even picked up her camera to photograph them.
Mark
Mark, thanks for your comment. I very nearly cited Ami as a great example, for exactly the reason you describe. I had the good fortune to photograph with Ami last year and, on a visit to Nizamuddin in Delhi she did precisely that – she came and sat with people, chatted and established relationships without once picking up her camera. I suspect that photography wasn’t even on her mind, although I don’t wish to speak for her. I’m sure that she was simply interested in having a conversation and that photography may have been a natural progression from that but it certainly wasn’t the priority. You only need to take a look at Ami’s work (www.amivitale.com) to know that this approach has paid great dividends and her images serve as a shining example of the benefits of taking time to understand and empathize with people before ever asking to photograph them.
Awesome piece Gavin! You said it perfectly and I think what you outline as “The Intention” should more often be the goal of travel/cultural photography. And if you think about it what often makes photos of your family compelling to you is exactly this relationship that they already have with you, the photographer.
Well spoken sir…
Gavin, spot on mate. I have to echo some of Franck’s sentiments though, I find the same difficulties. I had no problem engaging with the street food vendors in Bangkok when I was there nearly two years ago as I really enjoyed the food. I wish then I had more compunction to pick up the camera and ask their permission after those interactions, but I guess I was in the moment and enjoying the interaction without thinking about making some images.
Really like the new layout of the site, is it “Widescreen” from Graph Paper Press? I had been thinking about using that myself in the future.
Very nice piece, Gavin. It’s material for photo classes (which I guess it is). But here are two thoughts: The first is: Know the one you’re with. This is more than just engaging with them, because even engagement is superficious. Spending time with them is both respectful and achievable, even on a Bangkok street. It just depends on how much time you wish to invest.
Second thought: I had a visit from a Zimbabwean filmmaker in class the other day. Our question to her were: How can we best communicate the stories of the Others, i.e. the people we are visiting. Her answer surprised me, and made me think about my practice as a photographer on journeys: She said: You can’t tell their stories, you have to communicate your own story.
A challenging though I agree, but something I’m not allowed to forget from someone who’s used be on the receiving end of our lenses, microphones and pens.
An absolutely wonderful article punctuated with fabulous photos. I’m designating this as required reading for all my advanced students!
Agreed. Candids have their place, but they can’t stem from our fears.
I’ve never put this into words… making the subject feel comfortable, rather than myself… but it’s what I’ve been doing for the past 6 years.
I like the simplicity in this explanation and will spread it! Thanks for the insights…
This is one of the best blog posts I’ve read in a long time. It’s actually commonsense stuff that I think we all seem to forget at times.
It’s very timely for me too as I’m off to India in a few weeks (after being re-motivated by your Varanasi post) and I’ve been contemplating how to go about getting the shots I want. Your post has reconfirmed what I was contemplating anyway – Just relax, make friends, show genuine interest and have fun. Then pick up the camera.
And the new website design is looking great.
The skill of a great communicator is to make complex things seem simple, often by stripping away the layers of “want” and “need” to those of “understanding” and “what do you need”
With this post Gavin, you have not only helped many of us to understand the issue but also address the needs of many of those who will read this.
Your images continue to demonstrate the benefit of this philosophy and I, like many, review your “shared moments” with a sense of awe of what can be accomplished when the balance between vision, craft and compassion are in harmony
Wonderful post. Love the new look – much stronger in terms of your own personal brand and positioning as a commercial photographer rather than just (and you excel at the following anyway) a blogger, workshop leader and teacher
As a novice photographer grappling with my first portrait assignment for my photography class this article explains brilliantly how to bring humanity to portrait photography. For me it’s about knowing the difference between when you are a human being or a human doing. We spend so much of our lives in the “doing” mode that we often forget just to “be” with other people to talk, to be curious about them and suspend our judgement long enough to learn something new. Authenticity in human relationships comes from honesty, trust and confidence which means that to take a truly authentic portrait you have to invest in that relationship and like you say honour that person as they will honour you.
wonderful post. i’ve read it over and over and forwarded it to many friends. your advice is so true and on-point. thank you for sharing.
Gavin:
Incredible post. This past year of traveling and shooting has continued to confirm for me this approach. Sometimes it is hard to engage… especially for a somewhat shy person. But like you say, it’s not about us or even the image we “take”.
I have found that often time when we neglect to engage with the person, we miss their story. And because of that, the quick image may not be a true representation of who they are or their story.
I know we talked about this a few weeks ago and again were referencing Ami and how she lives with the people before ever bringing the camera out. Essential to really understand a story in my opinion.
Thanks again for the post.
-lane
P.S. Great meeting you in Thailand a few weeks ago.
Great post, Gavin. My time in Thailand was quite easy for getting portraits. As soon as I motioned to my camera at them. Their faces lit up with a great big smile. However, I think the better photographs are the ones of people whom I did connect with and they felt comfortable around me. That way, I got a more natural shot rather than a posed one.
Anyways, I am no expert as I do have questions. For instance, what about when a person wants money for their photograph? What are the ethical issues surrounding that? Many times in poor countries I feel like I am just a walking ATM machine. People don’t want to connect with me for being me but because I am, by their standards, wealthy. Their motive for connection is to get into my wallet. I am sure they would rather have a decent job rather than having to hustle me for a living. I understand that I would probably be doing the same thing if I were put into the same circumstance.